JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 22, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera

✓Claimant Claudia Obdulia Rios Lozano·Respondent Medimas E.P.S Chia

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Factor Territorial
  • Competencia a prevención del lugar donde ocurrió la violación o donde tiene efectos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado 22 Civil Municipal de Bogotá y el Juzgado Segundo Civil Municipal de Chía (Cundinamarca).

La controversia entre los despachos judiciales involucrados se generó en torno a la interpretación que hicieron del factor territorial.

Concluye la Corte que la autoridad que debe dar el trámite a la solicitud de amparo es la elegida a prevención por la accionante, la cual corresponde también a quien le asignaron el trámite de tutela en primer término.

Se dispone enviar el expediente al Juzgado del municipio de Chía para que de manera inmediata tramite y adopte la decisión de fondo a que haya lugar.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS auto del 1o de marzo de 2018, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil Municipal de Chia (Cundinamarca), dentro de la accion de tutela formulada por Claudia Obdulia Rios Lozano, en nombre de Obdulia Martinez de Lozano, contra Medimas EPS-Chia.
  3. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente ICC-3259 al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Civil Municipal de Chia (Cundinamarca), para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decision de fondo a que haya lugar.
  5. Tercero. Por la Secretaria General de la Corporacion, COMUNICAR la decision adoptada en esta providencia a la parte accionante y al Juzgado Veintidos Civil Municipal de Bogota D.C.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Presidente
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Magistrado
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Magistrado
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.